VAWA NEEDS TO BE REFORMED…
The Violence Against Women Act needs to be reformed, for a number of reasons:
- Ideology over Science: Domestic violence programs are based on the ideological notion that domestic violence is all about persons’ patriarchal need for “power and control.”
- Over-criminalization: Forty-six state DV/SA coalitions have called for an end to VAWA’s primary focus on “increased policing, prosecution, and imprisonment.”
- Non-cooperative victims: According to the National District Attorneys Association, “Recantation encompasses a vast majority of the domestic violence prosecutor’s caseload, occurring in about 80% of all domestic violence criminal cases.”
- Evidence of effectiveness: There is no good evidence that VAWA-funded programs have reduced rates of domestic violence.
- Neglect of male victims: In 2016-2017, there were 6.5 million male victims and 5.6 million female victims of physical domestic violence, according to the CDC. But male victims are often ignored.
- False allegations: A YouGov survey found that 8% of Americans have been victims of a false allegation of domestic violence, sexual assault, or child abuse.
- Immigration injustice: VAWA deprives U.S. citizens of the right to defend against an allegation by a foreign national.
- Waste, fraud, and financial abuse: Numerous instances of waste, fraud, and financial abuse by VAWA grantees point to a widespread and long-standing problem that shortchanges victims and cheats taxpayers.
- Constitutional protections: VAWA has been found to be violating numerous Constitutional rights and protections such as the right to due process, equal treatment under the law, right to a fair trial, and more.
- VAWA’s name: Given that men represent a majority of victims of domestic violence and coercive control, VAWA’s name should be modified to be gender inclusive, such as the “Partner Violence Reduction Act.”
ALSO SEE:
